Whatsapp messages are as admissable as messages from any other service, but if you are thinking of admissing Whatsapp messages to a court of law, I would strongly recommend you make a backup of that message. Either through screenshots or some kind of backup function. In fact, contracts are now very commonly executed, or signed, at least partially by fax or scanned copy, with one person signing, then transmitting the contract in some form to the other, who then signs it and transmits a countersigned version back. South Africa’s Supreme Court of Appeal is set to decide on whether a statement made over WhatsApp is legally binding. Sometimes these disputes are a result of poorly drafted contracts; content and deliverables not being adequately described; or as a result of variations to the original contract. The court found that “the use of his signature at the end of the February 2nd text message is evidence of his intent to have the writing be legally binding.” Therefore, the court found that the text message from the Seller’s agent, asking the Buyer to sign the letter of intent and provide a deposit, was a binding contract. The plaintiff relied on numerous print-out emails and WhatsApp messages to substantiate his claim for the defendant’s breach of contract. Copies and faxes of contracts, and scanned or electronically stored versions, are all "good" (valid) contracts and enforceable. We are legally bound by the legal contract we entered into. In the event of breach, the […] Preservation of the Evidence 2. WhatsApp on Friday postponed a data-sharing change as users concerned about privacy fled the Facebook-owned messaging service and flocked to rivals Telegram and Signal. Authentication 3. Case law refers to judge made decisions which are generally binding on a lower or later court. Under Singapore law, a written signature is not necessarily required for a valid contract - contracts are generally valid if legally competent parties reach an agreement, whether they agree verbally, electronically or in a physical paper document. Even though the SCA found in the present case that the WhatsApp message was not a binding contract, it does not mean that a WhatsApp message can never give rise to binding legal obligations. Preservation of the Evidence The first step is to save your evidence. WhatsApp is free and offers simple, secure, reliable messaging and calling, available on phones all over the world. The court held that the print-out WhatsApp messages fell within the wide meaning of “document” under the Evidence Act 1950 [5] , and as such can be admitted as evidence in court so long as: WhatsApp Messenger: More than 2 billion people in over 180 countries use WhatsApp to stay in touch with friends and family, anytime and anywhere. Yes, but your biggest hurdles are: 1. These statutes include the Evidence Act (EA), the Criminal Procedure Code (for criminal cases), and the Rules of Court (for civil cases). A contract is a legally binding agreement created by an offer and an acceptance between two or more parties who exchange consideration to create a legal obligation between them. Introduction A major cause of disputes occurs over the content of agreements. It sets out the rights and obligations of the contracting parties. To prove a valid contract, parties sometimes have to present evidence in court. Within the Singapore legal system, a body of statutes, together with case law, regulate the use of evidence in our courts. Hearsay 1.